Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Thomas G. GERAGHTY and Kathleen Geraghty, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AGWAY, INC., Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiffs commenced this action in Supreme Court, Onondaga County, seeking damages for injuries sustained by Thomas G. Geraghty (plaintiff) in a farming accident that occurred in Washington County. Plaintiffs are residents of Washington County. The accident occurred when plaintiff was servicing components of a liquid manure storage/handling system (system) manufactured and sold by defendant, a Delaware corporation with its principal office in Onondaga County.
Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510(3). In support of the motion, defendant submitted evidence demonstrating that six nonparty witnesses reside or work in Washington County and that their testimony is “necessary and material upon the trial of the action” (Jansen v. Bernhang, 149 A.D.2d 468, 469, 539 N.Y.S.2d 963; see, Rodriguez v. St. Paul's Catholic Church, 162 A.D.2d 1017, 1017-1018, 557 N.Y.S.2d 804). Further, the action arose in Washington County and, absent cogent reasons to direct otherwise, the trial should be held there (see, Rodriguez v. Wilson, 201 A.D.2d 636, 637, 608 N.Y.S.2d 250).
In opposition to the motion, plaintiffs failed to submit evidence supporting their choice of venue (see, Rodriguez v St. Paul's Catholic Church, supra, at 1018, 557 N.Y.S.2d 804). Plaintiffs did not identify any nonparty witnesses residing in Onondaga County, and speculation that witnesses familiar with the design and manufacture of the system reside there is insufficient to support plaintiffs' choice of venue (see, Thorner-Sidney Press v. Merling Marx & Seidman, 115 A.D.2d 328, 328-329, 495 N.Y.S.2d 868).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 21, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)