Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Deborah A. JAMES, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Belinda K. James, an Infant, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF OLEAN, Defendant. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services, Appellant.
The Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services (DSS) appeals from an order reducing its medical assistance lien on the proceeds of a $50,000 personal injury settlement between plaintiff and defendant. We agree with DSS that Supreme Court exceeded its authority in reducing the lien held by DSS from $28,527 to $8,558.10 (see Veno v. Saleh, 306 A.D.2d 876, 760 N.Y.S.2d 913). Plaintiff contends that the court had the authority to reduce the amount of the lien because the injuries to plaintiff's daughter were severe and her future medical expenses may exceed the net settlement amount. We reject that contention. Only the public welfare official has the authority “both to fix the amount of the lien and to release and discharge it” (Calvanese v. Calvanese, 93 N.Y.2d 111, 121, 688 N.Y.S.2d 479, 710 N.E.2d 1079; see Social Services Law § 104-b [1], [7] ). Contrary to plaintiff's further contention, the relevant provisions of the Social Services Law make no distinction between those persons who apply for Medicaid benefits separately and those, such as plaintiff's daughter, who receive Medicaid benefits as a result of their receipt of Supplemental Security Income benefits. Plaintiff's remaining contention is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not properly before us (see Hayner Hoyt Corp. v. Utica First Ins. Co., 306 A.D.2d 806, 760 N.Y.S.2d 706).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the original lien is reinstated.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 02, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)