Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 14, 1999, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Given the emergency room doctor's good faith belief that his patient, who collapsed at work, died under “sudden and unexplained circumstances”, he had a duty to call the Medical Examiner's office to inquire if the death would fall under that office's jurisdiction (see, Westchester County Administrative Law § 273.151, § 273.141). This was especially true since the emergency room doctor had been informed by the decedent's physician that there were no prior abnormalities, and he had been unsuccessful in attempting to reach a family member. Because we find no negligence with respect to the emergency room doctor, there is no basis for holding the hospital liable for its employee pursuant to a theory of respondeat superior.
Finally, once the Medical Examiner determined to accept jurisdiction, it had authority to conduct an autopsy, without first obtaining the consent of a family member, where no objection had been raised (Public Health Law § 4210-c [1]; compare, Harris-Cunningham v. Med. Examiner of New York County, 261 A.D.2d 285, 690 N.Y.S.2d 253 with Liberman v. Riverside Mem. Chapel, 225 A.D.2d 283, 650 N.Y.S.2d 194 and Bambrick v. Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 190 A.D.2d 646, 593 N.Y.S.2d 252), and the Medical Examiner's office had no reason to believe that the procedure was contrary to the decedent's religious beliefs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)