Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Sean R. McSHERRY, an attorney and counselor-at-law. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Sean R. McSherry, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent Sean R. McSherry was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on August 27, 1984, and at all times relevant to this proceeding has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
On August 3, 1999, respondent was convicted, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, of six counts of perjury in violation of 18 USC § 1623 and § 3551, one count of making a false statement in violation of 18 USC § 1001[a][2], and obstruction of justice in violation of 18 USC § 1503 and § 3551. He was sentenced to a term of two years on November 23, 1999 and a $5,000 fine. By petition dated June 12, 2000, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys. Respondent has not interposed a response. Insofar as a violation of 18 USC § 1623 is essentially similar to the felony of perjury in the first degree under New York Penal Law § 210.15 (Matter of Gellene, 246 A.D.2d 109, 676 N.Y.S.2d 161; Matter of DeSalvo, 189 A.D.2d 322, 597 N.Y.S.2d 2), respondent's disbarment under Judiciary Law § 90[4][b] is automatic.
Accordingly, the petition is granted and respondent's name is struck from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90[4][b].
Petition granted and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, as indicated.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 21, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)