Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Barbara LAWRENCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Austie LAWRENCE, Respondent, Rolland Lawrence and Elaine Lawrence, Respondents-Respondents.
In this custody dispute between the infant's grandmother (petitioner) and the infant's aunt and uncle (respondents), Family Court properly awarded respondents custody of the infant pursuant to a voluntary custodial arrangement made by the mother, who was estranged from petitioner and fearful that petitioner would limit her contact with the infant. Petitioner, who has custody of the mother's other children, instituted this proceeding to unite the infant with her siblings. A parent has a fundamental constitutional right to make a decision of this nature (see, Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, ----, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2059-2060, 147 L.Ed.2d 49), and courts may not interfere with such a decision in the absence of extraordinary circumstances (see, Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 545-546, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277). “Examples of cause or necessity permitting displacement of or intrusion on parental control would be fault or omission by the parent seriously affecting the welfare of a child, the preservation of the child's freedom from serious physical harm, illness or death, or the child's right to an education, and the like” (Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, supra, at 546, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277). Petitioner failed to establish that the separation of the infant from her siblings will seriously affect the infant's welfare, particularly in view of the fact that respondents are committed to fostering a relationship between the infant and her siblings.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 29, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)