Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Freddy TAVARES, Defendant-Appellant.
Contrary to the contention of defendant, the conviction of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25[2] ) is supported by legally sufficient evidence. The conviction stems from defendant's possession of dangerous contraband, i.e., a shank, in connection with an altercation with another inmate, while incarcerated in a State correctional facility. Although defendant threw the shank when ordered by correction officers to drop it, and the shank was not thereafter recovered, the other inmate and two correction officers testified that they observed the shank in defendant's possession. The correction officers testified that they observed defendant remove the shank from the waistband of his pants, and they described it as a cylinder shape, 8 to 10 inches long, with a point on one end and tape on the other. The other inmate testified that defendant struck him in the shoulder area and stabbed him in the back, and the nurse who treated the inmate testified that he had lacerations in the area of his right biceps and a small puncture wound on his back. We conclude that “there is [a] valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence at trial” (People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 16, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)