Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carmen ROSA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Jean Pierre Frito, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered April 17, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, apportioned 40% liability for plaintiff's injuries to defendants New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (the Transit Authority) and awarded plaintiff $650,000 for past pain and suffering, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to reduce the award to $610,000 pursuant to General Obligations Law § 15-108(a) and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter an amended judgment accordingly.
Since the testimony of the driver of the car and the driver of the bus owned by defendant Bravo Bus Service was uncontroverted that the car struck first plaintiff, who was standing on the sidewalk, and then Bravo's bus, which was further down the road, the court did not err in not including Bravo on the verdict sheet (see Koechlin v. Weintraub, 27 A.D.3d 219, 809 N.Y.S.2d 452 [2006] ). Further, counsel for the Transit Authority told the jury in summation that the evidence showed that Bravo's bus was parked properly (see Gale P. Elston, P.C. v. Dubois, 18 A.D.3d 301, 303, 795 N.Y.S.2d 33 [2005] ).
In view of the Transit Authority's failure to act diligently to procure its proposed witnesses to testify about its efforts to identify the bus driver involved in the accident, the trial court's preclusion of the Transit Authority from calling such witnesses did not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion (see Mayorga v. Jocarl & Ron Co., 41 A.D.3d 132, 134, 839 N.Y.S.2d 8 [2007], appeal dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 996, 849 N.Y.S.2d 22, 879 N.E.2d 162 [2007]; Paek v. City of New York, 28 A.D.3d 207, 208, 812 N.Y.S.2d 83 [2006], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 805, 831 N.Y.S.2d 107, 863 N.E.2d 112 [2007]; Shmueli v. The Corcoran Group, 29 A.D.3d 309, 816 N.Y.S.2d 410 [2006] ).
The award of $650,000 for past pain and suffering does not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see CPLR 5501[c] ). Plaintiff suffered five fractured bones, was hospitalized for approximately three months, and complained of pain from the 1997 accident through the 2006 trial.
The parties to the appeal have stipulated to the reduction of the award to reflect the settlement by Bravo of the action against it in the amount of $40,000, a setoff mandated by General Obligations Law § 15-108[a] (see Vazquetelles v. Gordon Co., 192 A.D.2d 322, 595 N.Y.S.2d 480 [1993], lv. dismissed 81 N.Y.2d 1067, 601 N.Y.S.2d 584, 619 N.E.2d 662 [1993] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 07, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)