Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael J. GEISS and Sandra Geiss, Respondents, v. C. Thomas MITCHELL, Jr., Appellant.
Michael J. Geiss (plaintiff) and his wife commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained when the bicycle that plaintiff was riding was struck by a vehicle operated by defendant. The parties are employees of the New York State Office of Parks and Recreation who work at Keewaydin State Park in the Town of Alexandria. The accident occurred on State Route 12 just outside the park entrance as plaintiff was leaving on a lunch-hour ride and as defendant, who was returning from lunch, was about to make a right-hand turn into the park.
Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the accident occurred within the course of defendant's employment and thus that Workers' Compensation is plaintiff's exclusive remedy (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 29[6] ). Except under limited circumstances not present here, “employees are not deemed to be within the scope of their employment while traveling to and from work” (Matter of Greene v. City of New York Dept. of Social Servs., 44 N.Y.2d 322, 325, 405 N.Y.S.2d 645, 376 N.E.2d 1291; cf., Matter of Husted v. Seneca Steel Serv., 41 N.Y.2d 140, 391 N.Y.S.2d 78, 359 N.E.2d 673). The park was open to the public, and all park visitors utilized the entrance road in the same manner. While the accident occurred in proximity to defendant's employment, “defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that the accident was causally related to a special risk of employment and that the risk to which plaintiff was exposed was not a risk shared generally by the public” (Wilson v. Ostergaard, 214 A.D.2d 984, 985, 626 N.Y.S.2d 624).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)