Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Cindy CLAFIN, Petitioner, v. Brian J. WING, Individually and as Acting Commissioner of New York State Department of Social Services, and Stephen P. Lyman, Individually and as Commissioner of Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondents.
There is no merit to the contention of petitioner that the notice of decision to discontinue her public assistance and medical assistance was not adequate to inform her of the action to be taken and the reasons for that action (see, Matter of Perry v. Wing, 242 A.D.2d 964, 665 N.Y.S.2d 947; cf., Matter of Pleasant v. Wing, 249 A.D.2d 986, 671 N.Y.S.2d 383). The notice stated that petitioner did not complete employment requirements because she failed to contact five employers per week for the week beginning May 30, 1997. At the fair hearing, Jefferson County Department of Social Services (DSS) submitted proof establishing that petitioner had failed to make the required number of employer contacts. DSS also submitted proof concerning an additional charge that petitioner failed to attend a Job Search appointment. The record establishes that petitioner presented a defense to that additional charge, and thus petitioner has failed to show how she was prejudiced by the allegedly defective notice (see, Matter of Garofalo v. Dowling, 223 A.D.2d 770, 772, 635 N.Y.S.2d 986; Matter of Mecca v. Dowling, 210 A.D.2d 821, 824, 620 N.Y.S.2d 584). Respondents' determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 180, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183; Matter of Casid v. Prinzo, 232 A.D.2d 860, 861-862, 649 N.Y.S.2d 64).
Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)