Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: RONALD SHAHALA G. and Others, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Catholic Home Bureau, Petitioner–Respondent; Ronald G., Respondent–Appellant, Brenda M. G., Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about May 20, 1999, insofar as appealed from, terminating respondent-appellant's parental rights to the subject children and committing their guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to cooperate with the agency's efforts to find him housing separate from his wife, whose parental rights were also terminated in the order on appeal upon a finding that she failed to enter a drug treatment program (cf., Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 143, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824). Termination of respondent's parental rights so as to free the children for adoption by their foster mother, rather than a suspended judgment, is in the children's best interests in view of the ample time and opportunity already given respondent to find adequate housing separate from his wife. We note the caseworker's testimony that the foster mother is willing to allow respondent to continue visiting the children in the event she adopts them and we suggest that such continued visitation be included in any order of adoption.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)