Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of The Arbitration Between STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellant, Julianna TREMAINE, Respondent-Respondent.
Respondent, a passenger in a motor vehicle owned by the State of New York (State), was involved in an accident on July 11, 1994. She served notice of an underinsurance claim on petitioner, her insurer, 2 1/212 years later, in December 1996. Respondent thereafter filed an uninsured claim under the State insurance policy and, after settling with the State for its policy limit, served a demand for arbitration of her underinsurance claim on petitioner. Supreme Court erred in denying the application to stay arbitration. Respondent's insurance policy required that she provide notice of an underinsurance claim “[a]s soon as practicable”, which the Court of Appeals has defined in the underinsurance context as “with reasonable promptness after the insured knew or should reasonably have known that the tortfeasor was underinsured” (Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mancuso, 93 N.Y.2d 487, 495, 693 N.Y.S.2d 81, 715 N.E.2d 107). Delay in giving notice may be excused, but “the burden of establishing a reasonable excuse for the delay is upon the insured” (Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], 249 A.D.2d 924, 925, 672 N.Y.S.2d 219). Here, respondent offered no excuse for the 2 1/212-year delay after the accident, and we conclude that the unexplained delay of 2 1/212 years was unreasonable as a matter of law (see, Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], supra; see also, Unwin v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 268 A.D.2d 669, 700 N.Y.S.2d 580).
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application granted.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 29, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)