Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond JACOBS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered July 20, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of three counts of repeated failure to file personal income and earnings taxes and two counts of failure to file a return or report or supply information, and sentencing him to three terms of 1 to 3 years and two terms of 1 year, all to be served concurrently, and to make restitution of $39,294.47, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
The court properly excluded testimony from defendant's former coworker about his conversations with defendant regarding their belief that certain City employees, including defendant, were not required to file New York State returns. Although defendant's state of mind was relevant, this evidence was inadmissible as hearsay in the context of the case because it was offered “to establish the past fact of defendant's prior beliefs” (People v. Reynoso, 73 N.Y.2d 816, 819, 537 N.Y.S.2d 113, 534 N.E.2d 30). In any event, were we to find any error, we would find it to be harmless. To the extent that defendant is raising a claim that, notwithstanding the rules of evidence, the evidence should have been admitted as a matter of constitutional law, such claim is unpreserved (People v. Benjamin, 272 A.D.2d 276, 709 N.Y.S.2d 517), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice.
We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 05, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)