Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Noah LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered December 15, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 13 years and 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly declined to charge assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree where the integrated testimony of the victim left no reasonable view of the evidence by which the jury could have convicted defendant of the lesser, but not the greater, count (see, People v. Negron, 91 N.Y.2d 788, 676 N.Y.S.2d 520, 699 N.E.2d 32).
The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting a piece of rope into evidence. The victim's testimony was clear that the piece of rope that was admitted into evidence was not the exact piece that defendant had allegedly put around her neck, but was very similar to it and was cut from the same clothesline and was found by her in the apartment immediately after the attack. Under these circumstances, and in light of the medical testimony linking the pattern in the rope to the furrows left in the victim's neck, the rope was properly admitted into evidence as relevant to the issues before the jury (see, People v. Del Vermo, 192 N.Y. 470, 478-482, 85 N.E. 690), and there is no reason to believe that the jury was misled about its import.
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 21, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)