Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Diane LIGGINS, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. DALY II ASSOCIATES, et al., Defendants-Appellants, H. Weintraub & Son, Inc., Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.), entered on or about July 9, 1999, which denied the motion of defendants Daly II Associates and CHP Management Corporation for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of directing that defendants forthwith disclose the name and last known address of the building porter on duty at the time of plaintiff's accident and granting plaintiffs leave to depose such porter within 90 days of defendants' disclosure, and to the further extent of granting defendants leave to renew their motion for summary judgment, either subsequent to the porter's deposition or 90 days after their disclosure of the aforesaid information, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Defendants' motion for summary judgment was premature in light of the circumstance that the name and address of the porter who was on duty at the time of plaintiff Diane Liggins' accident, and who may have been responsible for cleaning and mopping the basement floor where plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell upon an accumulation of water, had not yet been disclosed (see, Colicchio v. Port Auth. of New York and New Jersey, 246 A.D.2d 464, 465, 668 N.Y.S.2d 385). Accordingly, we modify to direct the disclosure of said porter's identity and last known address and to permit plaintiffs to depose him or her and, subsequent to such deposition or opportunity therefor, to permit defendants-appellants to renew their motion for summary judgment.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 19, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)