Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CARMINE RESTAURANT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al., Defendants-Respondents. [And A Third-Party Action].
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered March 1, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, in this action to recover proceeds from forged checks cashed without authorization by plaintiff's employee, upon the prior grant of defendant Citibank's motion pursuant to CPLR 4401, dismissed the action as against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The admissions of plaintiff's principal during direct examination, that plaintiff's blank checks were kept in an unlocked cabinet in a heavily trafficked area and that the key to the principal's mail cabinet, which contained unopened mail, was openly and plainly available to all employees, demonstrated negligence by plaintiff in safeguarding, maintaining and controlling its blank checks that substantially contributed to the making of the unauthorized checks. In light of plaintiff's admissions and defendant Citibank's offer of proof that the testimony of plaintiff's remaining witness would not be relevant to the claims against it in its capacity as the drawee bank, the grant of Citibank's motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment during trial was proper (see UCC 3-406; Fundacion Museo de Arte Contemporaneo de Caracas-Sofia Imber v. CBI-TDB Union Bancaire Privee, 996 F.Supp. 277, 290, affd. 2d Cir., 160 F.3d 146). There was no need for the trial court to reserve decision until the conclusion of the case (see 676 R.S.D. Inc. v. Scandia Realty, 195 A.D.2d 387, 600 N.Y.S.2d 678).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 19, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)