Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the J. CHILDREN, Children Under The Age of, Eighteen Years, etc., Alex D., Respondent–Appellant, Utisha J., Respondent, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Petitioner–Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about December 17, 1998, which, upon findings of abuse, placed the subject children in the custody of petitioner Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Family Court's findings are adequately supported by the children's cross-corroborating out-of-court statements that respondent had hit the middle child causing her fractured femur, the mother's testimony that respondent struck the eldest child causing the scar under his eye, and other eyewitness testimony of marks of injury on the eldest child (see, Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 118–119, 124, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914; Matter of H. and J. Children v. Carmen J., 209 A.D.2d 525, 619 N.Y.S.2d 65). There is no merit to respondent's claim that Family Court erred in admitting transcripts of the hearing held pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028 in lieu of any new evidence at the fact-finding hearing. All parties stipulated to this procedure, thus waiving the requirement that the witnesses first be shown to be unavailable (see, Robinson v. State of New York, 228 A.D.2d 52, 55, 650 N.Y.S.2d 894, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 812, 657 N.Y.S.2d 404, 679 N.E.2d 643). We have considered respondent's other arguments, including that his attorney was ineffective, and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 26, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)