Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Order to Extend, etc., Pursuant to CPL 330.20 in Relation to Hugh KELLY. Manhattan Psychiatric Center, Petitioner-Appellant, Hugh Kelly, Respondent-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about December 10, 1998, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner's application to extend an order of conditions imposed pursuant to CPL 330.20, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The hearing court's determination that petitioner failed to show good cause for extending the order of conditions imposed upon respondent (see, CPL 330.20[1][o] ) and that respondent's release from the conditions was consistent with public safety is supported by the record. The record reveals that, since his release from a psychiatric facility in 1990, respondent, who has not required psychotropic medication for at least 17 years, has successfully adjusted to living in the community without incident and has not resorted to violence, even when provoked. According to the hearing court's CPL 330.20 findings the deference they are due, since the court sitting as trier of fact was “in the best position to evaluate the individual's behavior as well as the weight and credibility of the often conflicting testimony of the medical and psychiatric experts” (Matter of George L., 85 N.Y.2d 295, 305, 624 N.Y.S.2d 99, 648 N.E.2d 475), we perceive no ground to disturb the determination that there was no longer good cause for respondent's submission to mandatory counseling as a condition of his release.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 05, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)