Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered March 26, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 8 years, unanimously modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding the matter for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed.
Defendant pleaded guilty in March 1999 to robbery in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment filed against him. After acknowledging that he had discussed the plea with his attorney, that he understood the rights he was giving up by pleading guilty, and that he was pleading guilty voluntarily, he admitted that he had forcibly stolen money from a United Parcel Service delivery man while displaying a pistol. In exchange for his plea, the court promised defendant a term of 8 years, the minimum for a second felony offender. No predicate felony statement was filed and defendant was not provided an opportunity to challenge such a statement when he appeared for sentencing on March 26, 1999, at which time the court sentenced him to the promised term of 8 years.
As the People concede, because the predicate felony statement was not filed with the court before sentence was imposed, as required by CPL 400.21, the case must be remitted to afford defendant an opportunity to controvert the statement (see People v. Davis, 240 A.D.2d 309, 659 N.Y.S.2d 437; lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 871, 668 N.Y.S.2d 570, 691 N.E.2d 642).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: August 03, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)