Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Scott KREITZER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. The NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS, et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered September 15, 2004, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted petitioner's application to annul the determination of respondent Department of Buildings (DOB) “nullifying” petitioner's master plumber's license as erroneously issued, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
DOB advised petitioner by letter that it intended to “nullify” his master plumber's license on the ground that an investigation revealed that at the time it was issued, more than 11 years earlier, petitioner was not employed, and had not met the requirement of seven years' prior experience in the “direct employ” of a licensed master plumber. Petitioner contested the agency's determination, and requested a hearing. He then brought this article 78 proceeding for an order enjoining DOB from nullifying his license, or alternatively, enjoining DOB from proceeding with the nullification until he had an opportunity for discovery and a hearing. The IAS court granted that portion of Kreitzer's petition seeking to annul DOB's action. We affirm.
Because the matter presented is one of pure statutory interpretation, no deference is accorded to the agency's determinations (Matter of Guido v. New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 94 N.Y.2d 64, 68, 699 N.Y.S.2d 697, 721 N.E.2d 947 [1999] ). Interpretation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 26 to engraft the “direct employ” language from § 26-141(c) onto the “seven years experience” requirement for eligibility for a license under Administrative Code § 26-146(a)(1) is irrational. Section 26-146 does not contain any such requirement, and the record shows that when the subject license was issued DOB did not so interpret it.
The Department of Personnel's evaluation of petitioner's application was based on the endorsement of seven licensed master plumbers, under whose supervision petitioner had worked for more than the requisite seven years (cf. Matter of Reingold v. Koch, 111 A.D.2d 688, 490 N.Y.S.2d 508 [1985], affd. 66 N.Y.2d 994, 499 N.Y.S.2d 395, 489 N.E.2d 1297 [1985] [application properly denied where petitioner had only three years of supervised experience] ). To establish that petitioner was also under the “direct employ” of these licensed master plumbers is an onerous requirement, not found in the statute. We decline to adopt such an interpretation, and we affirm the court's finding that petitioner's license was lawfully obtained.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 29, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)