Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rachel SELINGER, Respondent-Appellant, v. Irwin SELINGER, Appellant-Respondent.
Motion by appellant-respondent for leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dated October 15, 1996 dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant-respondent having previously moved in this Court for leave to appeal (89 N.Y.2d 981, 656 N.Y.S.2d 739, 678 N.E.2d 1355) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see, Hull-Hazard Inc. v. Roberts, 73 N.Y.2d 867, 537 N.Y.S.2d 486, 534 N.E.2d 324). Cross motion by respondent-appellant for leave to appeal pursuant to CPLR 5602(a)(1)(ii) from the Supreme Court counter-amended judgment of divorce, dated February 18, 1997, to bring up for review the Appellate Division order dated October 15, 1996, denied.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 17, 1997
Court: Court of Appeals of New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)