Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Andrew ROSSILLON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
In September 2020, appellant was convicted, pursuant to a guilty plea, of attempted theft and the district court sentenced him to 364 days in jail, suspended the sentence, and placed him on probation for a term not to exceed one year. Several weeks after the sentencing hearing but before entry of the written judgment of conviction, the Department of Parole and Probation filed a probation violation report. On October 15, 2020, after conducting a hearing, the district court revoked probation and reduced the sentence to six months with 72 days of credit for time served. A written judgment of conviction was entered a few days later, but it reflected the original sentence and probationary term orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing. A written order memorializing the revocation of probation and modified sentence was entered on November 17, 2021.
Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion in revoking probation. The State counters that this appeal is moot because appellant expired his sentence during the pendency of the appeal. Appellant has not responded to that argument.
“A case is moot if it seeks to determine an abstract question which does not rest upon existing facts or rights,” and a case which may have been justiciable at the beginning of the litigation, may become moot due to later occurrences. Newman v. State, 132 Nev. 340, 344, 373 P.3d 855, 857 (2016) (internal quotation and citation omitted). Based on the State's representation that appellant has expired his sentence in this case, we can afford appellant no relief on his challenge to the probation revocation decision. See generally Johnson v. Dir., Dep't of Prisons, 105 Nev. 314, 316, 774 P.2d 1047, 1049 (1989) (recognizing that expiration of a defendant's sentence rendered any question concerning the computation of credits moot). This appeal therefore is moot. Accordingly, we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.1
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 82024
Decided: December 17, 2021
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)