Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marlene ROGOFF, Appellant, v. James MARSH, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a post-judgment district court order determining appellant to be a vexatious litigant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge.
Review of appellant' notice of appeal and the other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule.” See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a post-judgment vexatious litigant order. Peck v. Crouser, 129 Nev. 120, 295 P.3d 586 (2013). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
FOOTNOTES
1. Respondent’s motion to dismiss this appeal is denied as moot and the request for sanctions is denied.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 80829
Decided: April 16, 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)