Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Travis Wilford BOWLES, Petitioner, v. The SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF WASHOE; and the Honorable Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge, Respondents.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
Petitioner was convicted in 2012 of six counts of lewdness with a child under the age of 14 years. In 2013, petitioner filed in the district court a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and in 2015, petitioner supplemented his petition. The State moved to dismiss the petition and supplemented petition, and in 2016, after holding a hearing on the motion, the district court dismissed petitioner's habeas action. The district court order of dismissal indicates that the district court considered petitioner's claims for relief and determined that they did not warrant an evidentiary hearing. Petitioner now seeks a writ from this court directing the district court to reinstate his habeas action.
This court has original jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus, and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this court's sole discretion. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act which the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station. NRS 34.160. Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004).
Having considered the petition, we conclude that our extraordinary relief is not warranted. A district court's dismissal of a postconviction habeas petition without an evidentiary hearing is not procedurally improper, NRS 34.770(2) (“If the judge or justice determines that the petitioner is not entitled to relief and an evidentiary hearing is not required, the judge or justice shall dismiss the petition without a hearing.”), and the challenged district court order expressly determined that no evidentiary hearing was warranted. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court's determination was improper or that petitioner's habeas petition should be reinstated. See NRS 34.160. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 85448
Decided: October 13, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)