Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
5312 LA QUINTA HILLS, LLC, Appellant, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP as successor in Interest to Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; ReconTrust Company, NA; and Absolute Collection Services, LLC, Respondents.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment in an action to quiet title. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Valerie Adair, Judge. Reviewing the summary judgment de novo, Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 729, 121 P.3d 1026, 1029 (2005), we affirm.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of respondent BAC Home Loans on two grounds: (1) BAC satisfied the superpriority portion of the homeowner association's lien before the foreclosure sale thus discharging that portion of the lien; and (2) 12 U.S.C. § 4617(j)(3) (2012) (the Federal Foreclosure Bar) preempts NRS 116.3116 where, as here, the mortgage loan is owned by Fannie Mae. Appellant challenges only the first ground on appeal. Because the district court granted summary judgment on an alternative ground—that the Federal Foreclosure Bar preempts NRS 116.3116 in this case—not challenged by appellant, we affirm.1 E.g., Hillis v. Heineman, 626 F.3d 1014, 1019 n.1 (9th Cir. 2010) (affirming where appellants did not challenge alternative ground on which the district court dismissed the action); AED, Inc. v. KDC Inv., LLC, 307 P.3d 176, 181 (Idaho 2013) (“[I]f an appellant fails to contest all of the grounds upon which a district court based its grant of summary judgment, the judgment must be affirmed.”); Gilbert v. Utah State Bar, 379 P.3d 1247, 1254–55 (Utah 2016) (“[W]e will not reverse a ruling of the district court that rests on independent alternative grounds where the appellant challenges only one of those grounds.”).
It is so ORDERED.
FOOTNOTES
1. The district court's conclusion on the preemption issue is consistent with our recent decision in Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9641 Christine View v. Federal National Mortgage Association, 134 Nev., Adv. Op. 36, ––– P.3d –––– (2018).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 71069
Decided: June 15, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)