Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: David Paul DANIELS, an Attorney at Law.
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on October 27, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that DAVID PAUL DANIELS of CAMDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(a) (entering into an improper business transaction with a client), RPC 1.8(e) (providing financial assistance to a client in connection with a pending or litigated matter), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard client funds), and RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6),
And the Disciplinary Review Board further having concluded that respondent should be required to practice under supervision for a period of two years and to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics on a quarterly basis certified trust account reconciliations prepared by a certified public accountant approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that DAVID PAUL DANIELS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall submit, on a schedule to be established by the Office of Attorney Ethics, certified quarterly trust account reconciliations prepared by a certified public accountant approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 29, 1999
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)