Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael H. KESSLER, an Attorney at Law.
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on October 16, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MICHAEL H. KESSLER of UNION, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard client funds), Rule 1:21-6(b)(1), (2), and (8) and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and RPC 8.4(c) (misrepresentations);
And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit psychiatric proof of his fitness to practice law and to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics annual audits of his attorney books and records for a period of two years;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that MICHAEL H. KESSLER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics the report of a psychiatrist attesting to respondent's fitness to practice law; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics on a schedule established by that office an annual accounting of the books and records required to be maintained by Rule 1:21-6, prepared by a certified public accountant approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 29, 1999
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)