Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MANUEL A. OLIVEIRA.
Appellant Manuel Oliveira appeals from a final decision of the Civil Service Commission (CSC) 2 denying appellant's application for back pay and counsel fees. Appellant is a Senior Corrections Officer with the Department of Corrections (DOC), who was removed from his employment on May 31, 2001. On October 20, 2005, the Merit System Board found that mitigating circumstances warranted a six-month suspension rather than removal. Following denial of a motion for reconsideration by the DOC, appellant returned to duty and pay status on April 24, 2006.
When the parties failed to agree on the amount of back pay and other benefit credits due to appellant, he requested the Merit System Board resolve these issues. In support of his application for back pay, appellant certified that he did not work for the entire time of his suspension. He further certified that he applied for three security positions with three different companies, but did not obtain a position. He further stated that he applied for a job in construction, which he did not obtain. He surmised that he was perceived as “damaged goods” and made no further efforts to obtain employment.
In its final decision, the CSC found that appellant was not entitled to back pay because he did not make reasonable efforts to mitigate his damages. The agency also found that appellant was not entitled to counsel fees because the record did not support a finding that his employer unreasonably delayed implementation of the reinstatement order. The CSC awarded appellant twenty vacation days for 2005 and 2006, the maximum number of days permitted by statute.
On appeal, appellant argues that the CSC acted arbitrarily and unreasonably in denying back pay and limiting his vacation time. He further contends he is entitled to counsel fees. We disagree. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find that the decision of the CSC is supported by sufficient credible evidence on the record as a whole, Rule 2:11-3(e)(1)(D), and is consistent with the law governing the award of back pay and benefits, O'Lone v. Dep't of Human Servs., 357 N.J.Super. 170 (App.Div.2003). See N.J.S.A. 11A:6-2(f); N.J.A.C. 4A:6-1.2(g).
Affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
FN2. Effective June 30, 2008, the Civil Service Commission was reconstituted and assumed the duties of the Department of Personnel and the Merit System Board. N.J.S.A. 11A:11-2b.. FN2. Effective June 30, 2008, the Civil Service Commission was reconstituted and assumed the duties of the Department of Personnel and the Merit System Board. N.J.S.A. 11A:11-2b.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: DOCKET NO. A-3325-08T2
Decided: October 08, 2010
Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)