Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jennifer Marie GWILLIAMS, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Terry Lynn GWILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellee
[¶1] Jennifer Gwilliams appeals from a district court order denying her motion for N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) relief from a divorce judgment. She also appeals from an order denying her motion for contempt and granting Terry Gwilliams’ motion to stay enforcement of the judgment pending disposition of this appeal. We affirm.
[¶2] Jennifer Gwilliams argues her appeal divested the district court of jurisdiction to enter the stay. We disagree. Whether to stay enforcement of a judgment pending appeal is a collateral matter within the district court's jurisdiction. See N.D.R.App.P. 8(a)(1)(A) (a party must ordinarily move first in the district court for a stay of the judgment pending appeal); N.D.R.Civ.P. 62(b) (a party may obtain a stay after judgment is entered by providing a bond or other security); Holkesvig v. Grove, 2014 ND 57, ¶ 16, 844 N.W.2d 557 (district courts retain jurisdiction to decide matters that arise subsequent to the judgment and are collateral to the issues on appeal); Verry v. Murphy, 163 N.W.2d 721, 725 (N.D. 1968) (“The stay of an execution upon appeal is an independent and collateral proceeding[.]”); Bonde v. Stern, 72 N.D. 476, 8 N.W.2d 457, 461 (N.D. 1943) (“The district court does not become shorn of power in a stay proceeding when an appeal is taken from the order or judgment the execution or performance of which is sought to be stayed.”)
[¶3] Jennifer Gwilliams also argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied her motion for N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) post-judgment relief and her motion for contempt. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). See Davis v. Davis, 2021 ND 24, ¶ 5, 955 N.W.2d 117 (“The standard of review for motions under Rule 60(b) is abuse of discretion.”); Canerdy v. Canerdy, 2022 ND 61, ¶ 8, 971 N.W.2d 873 (“We will not disturb a district court's contempt determination unless the court abused its discretion.”)
[¶4] Terry Gwilliams argues the appeal is frivolous and requests we award sanctions on appeal. We decline to do so. The district court's orders are affirmed.
McEvers, Justice.
[¶5] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20220149
Decided: May 30, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)