Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kurt Noel JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant
[¶1] Kurt Johnson appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of domestic violence and false information or report to law enforcement. Johnson asserts the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions. To preserve an argument on sufficiency of the evidence for appeal, a defendant must move for acquittal under N.D.R.Crim.P. 29. State v. Rourke, 2017 ND 102, ¶ 7, 893 N.W.2d 176. A motion to dismiss may be treated as a motion for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a). State v. Krull, 2005 ND 63, ¶ 13, 693 N.W.2d 631. Johnson made a motion to dismiss before the trial began. Motions to dismiss made before the trial begins do not meet the requirements of a motion for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a). Johnson did not preserve this issue for appeal.
[¶2] “The exception to the requirement of a motion for judgment of acquittal is if the trial court committed obvious error.” City of Fargo v. Lunday, 2009 ND 9, ¶ 5, 760 N.W.2d 136. “[I]t is the defendant's burden to show an obvious error that effects a substantial right.” Rourke, 2017 ND 102, ¶ 8, 893 N.W.2d 176. Johnson failed to argue obvious error on appeal. “We need not exercise our discretion to notice obvious error in an appeal when the defendant does not raise the issue of obvious error[.]” Id. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Smith, 2019 ND 239, ¶ 15, 934 N.W.2d 1 (“[W]e are not required to exercise our discretion to notice obvious error when the defendant has not raised an issue about obvious error on appeal.”).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20220331
Decided: May 30, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)