Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Nicholas Mark CARPENTER, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
[¶1] Nicholas Mark Carpenter appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In 2017, Carpenter was arrested on a warrant issued for his failure to appear in another case. During the arrest and search of Carpenter, officers located drugs and drug paraphernalia. The underlying warrant was subsequently dismissed as invalid. Carpenter was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment following a guilty plea. Carpenter applied for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, arguing his attorneys’ conduct was unreasonable in failing to file a motion to suppress evidence. At the post-conviction hearing, both of Carpenter's attorneys testified they believed a suppression motion was unwarranted based upon United States Supreme Court precedent. The district court found Carpenter failed to show his attorneys’ assistance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and therefore failed to satisfy the first prong of the Strickland test.
[¶2] We conclude the district court's findings regarding the first prong, whether counsel's conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, are not clearly erroneous. Courts need not address both prongs of the Strickland test if the matter can be resolved by addressing only one prong. Rencountre v. State, 2015 ND 62, ¶ 7, 860 N.W.2d 837 (citing Osier v. State, 2014 ND 41, ¶ 11, 843 N.W.2d 277). The court did not clearly err in denying Carpenter's application for post-conviction relief, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20210104
Decided: September 30, 2021
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)