Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jorge Alberto VELASQUEZ, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
[¶1] Jorge Alberto Velasquez appeals from a judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Velasquez argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction relief because his trial counsel's conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness when trial counsel did not provide Velasquez paper discovery or review a video recording with him. The court found Velasquez's pleas were completely voluntary and his real reason for his application for post-conviction relief was that he was facing charges in federal court, and the conviction would enhance his sentence.
[¶2] We conclude the district court's findings are not clearly erroneous. Therefore, Velasquez failed the second prong of the Strickland test, which “is satisfied in the context of a guilty plea if the defendant shows ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.’ ” Lindsey v. State, 2014 ND 174, ¶ 19, 852 N.W.2d 383 (quoting Ernst v. State, 2004 ND 152, ¶ 10, 683 N.W.2d 891). Courts need not address both prongs of the Strickland test if the matter can be resolved by addressing only one prong. Rencountre v. State, 2015 ND 62, ¶ 7, 860 N.W.2d 837 (citing Osier v. State, 2014 ND 41, ¶¶ 10-11, 843 N.W.2d 277). The court did not err in denying Velasquez's application for post-conviction relief, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20200043
Decided: September 15, 2020
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)