STATE v. STENBAK (2020)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Clark STENBAK, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190401

Decided: June 02, 2020

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Wade G. Enget, Mountrail County State’s Attorney, Stanley, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

[¶1] Clark Stenbak appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of menacing and preventing arrest. Stenbak argues insufficient evidence was presented to sustain his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of the convictions. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle