STATE v. STENBAK (2020)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Clark STENBAK, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190401

Decided: June 02, 2020

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Wade G. Enget, Mountrail County State’s Attorney, Stanley, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

[¶1] Clark Stenbak appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of menacing and preventing arrest. Stenbak argues insufficient evidence was presented to sustain his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of the convictions. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network