Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Dakota, BY AND THROUGH the OFFICE OF STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Bradley BOSSET, Defendant and Appellant
[¶1] Bradley Bosset appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the State Tax Commissioner, assessing Bosset state income tax for the years 2012 through 2016. Bosset mentions but does not fully support a number of issues, including that the evidence does not support the determination he has a federal tax liability and therefore a state tax liability. He further argues the district court erred by not using statutory definitions when they differ from common definitions; erred by failing to follow precedent and adhering to the constitutional avoidance doctrine; erred by not requiring strict proof of his liability; and erred by misstating his statement and thereby showed bias and prejudice. He contends the State’s failure to address issues he raised is evidence of acquiescence.
[¶2] The essence of Bosset’s argument is that North Dakota’s income tax is unconstitutional and that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on the basis of the evidence submitted with the State’s motion for summary judgment, which included the Certificate of the Tax Commissioner, affidavits from employees of the Office of State Tax Commissioner and supporting exhibits. Under N.D.C.C. § 57-38-46, the Certificate of the Tax Commissioner constitutes “prima facie evidence that such tax has not been paid, that such return has not been filed, or that such information has not been supplied.” The State asserts the only material facts in an action arising from a non-filer tax assessment under N.D.C.C. §§ 57-38-39(7) and 57-38-45(6) are: 1) the Tax Commissioner found a person has an obligation to file a North Dakota income tax return and failed to do so; 2) the statutory notice to file was provided to the taxpayer; 3) the return was not filed within thirty days; 4) the Tax Commissioner assessed tax; and 5) the assessed tax has not been paid.
[¶3] The summary judgment is supported by the record and North Dakota’s income tax is constitutional. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6) and (7); see State v. Benson, 376 N.W.2d 36, 40 n.6 (N.D. 1985) (citing State v. Nichols, 66 N.D. 355, 265 N.W. 859 (1935), and Dorgan v. Kouba, 274 N.W.2d 167 (N.D. 1978), and reiterating holding “that North Dakota’s income tax law, and particularly Section 57-38-31, N.D.C.C., was constitutional.”).
Per Curiam.
[¶4] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20190185
Decided: December 12, 2019
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)