Skip to main content


Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Daniel Lynn GOLDSACK, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20180265 and 20180266

Decided: February 21, 2019

Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] Daniel Goldsack appeals from a district court’s second amended criminal judgments revoking his probation. Goldsack argues the district court clearly erred in finding a probation violation occurred and the State did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence Goldsack violated the conditions of his probation. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4) and (7). See, e.g., State v. McAvoy, 2007 ND 178, ¶¶ 9, 18, 741 N.W.2d 198 (holding the trial court’s factual findings of a probation violation were not clearly erroneous and concluding the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant’s probation).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Copied to clipboard