Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Scott Owen PARKS, Defendant and Appellant
[¶1] Scott Parks appealed after conditionally pleading guilty to charges of possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Parks argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a purported illegal stop of his vehicle, contending the stop was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion. We summarily affirm the amended criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). See City of West Fargo v. Ross, 2001 ND 163, 634 N.W.2d 527.
Per Curiam.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20170462
Decided: May 08, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)