Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
INTEREST OF S.M., a Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. S.M., Child; R.M., Mother (Deceased); Sharla Price, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and T.B., Jr., Father, Respondent and Appellant
[¶1] T.B. (the Father) appeals from a juvenile court's findings and order terminating his parental rights to S.M.
[¶2] A juvenile court's findings of fact in a parental termination proceeding are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard of N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a). In re A.C., 2022 ND 123, ¶ 5, 975 N.W.2d 567. “Under the clearly erroneous standard of review, we affirm the decision of the juvenile court unless it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if there is no evidence to support it, or if, on the entire record, we are left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made.” In re A.L.E., 2018 ND 257, ¶ 4, 920 N.W.2d 461.
[¶3] This case is governed by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), which requires “affirmative, active, thorough, and timely efforts intended primarily to maintain or reunite an Indian child with the Indian child's family.” N.D.C.C. § 27-19.1-01(1)(a). Before a court may order termination of parental rights, ICWA further requires the court determine, “by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that continued custody of the Indian child by the parent ․ is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child.” N.D.C.C. § 27-19.1-01(4); 25 U.S.C. § 1912(f); see also N.D.C.C. § 27-20.2-15(4) (same).
[¶4] Based upon our review of the record, the juvenile court's findings S.M. is deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, and S.M. is suffering, or will in the future probably suffer, serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm are not clearly erroneous. The juvenile court's findings active efforts were made to maintain or reunite S.M. with his family and the evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that the continued custody of S.M. by T.B. is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to S.M. are not clearly erroneous. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in terminating T.B.’s parental rights to S.M. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
Per Curiam.
[¶5] Lisa Fair McEvers, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen Douglas A. Bahr
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20260006
Decided: February 12, 2026
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)