MSN APRN FNP v. D.M.E., Respondent and Appellant (2024)

[¶1] D.M.E. appeals from orders for hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication. D.M.E. argues the district court erred in finding she is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment, and in granting the request for involuntary treatment with medication. We conclude the court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. See In re S.R.B., 2013 ND 109, ¶ 7, 832 N.W.2d 42 (stating that the court's findings in an order for hospitalization and treatment are “subject to a more probing clearly erroneous standard of review”). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr