Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Carolina v. Cody Wayne ALLEN, Defendant.
I. Background
¶ 1 Defendant Cody Wayne Allen was tried and found guilty of several crimes. Additionally, the trial court entered civil judgments requiring Defendant to pay $8,531.25 in attorney fees and expenses and a $60.00 attorney appointment fee. Defendant appealed from the criminal judgments orally, but he failed to appeal from the civil judgments properly by failing to provide timely written notice of appeal. See N.C. R. App. P. 3(a). Thus, Defendant filed a petition for writ of certiorari, appealing the civil judgments.
II. Analysis
¶ 2 This appeal concerns only the civil judgments. As Defendant has failed to preserve his appeal, he has petitioned our Court to issue a writ of certiorari. The State does not oppose this petition. In our discretion, we grant Defendant's petition.
¶ 3 Turning to the merits of Defendant's appeal, Defendant argues that he was not given the opportunity to be heard regarding the civil judgments. Indeed, our Supreme Court has held that it is error for a trial court to enter an award for attorney's fees without notice to the defendant and without providing an opportunity to be heard. State v. Crews, 284 N.C. 427, 441-42, 201 S.E.2d 840, 849-50 (1974).
¶ 4 Here, the State concedes that “there is no evidence in the Record establishing that Defendant was provided notice and an opportunity to be heard” as to the civil judgments. We agree and conclude that Defendant is entitled to a new hearing on the matter. Accordingly, we vacate the civil judgments and remand the matter for a hearing, allowing Defendant an opportunity to be heard.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Report per Rule 30(e).
DILLON, Judge.
Judges CARPENTER and GORE concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. COA20-468
Decided: September 07, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)