STATE v. RHODES (2019)

Defendant James Thomas Rhodes was convicted by a jury for possession of firearm by a felon and felony possession of stolen goods. Defendant then entered a guilty plea to attaining the status of a habitual felon.

Defendant did not timely appeal, but later filed a petition for writ of certiorari with this Court, seeking review of the judgment entered against him. A panel of our Court allowed the petition.

Defendant's counsel avers she has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief and asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that she has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising Defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with the documents necessary to do so. Counsel has also set forth one argument she considered making on appeal but rejected as without merit. Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own behalf, and a reasonable time within which he could have done so has passed.

In accordance with Anders and Kinch, we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear to exist. We agree with Defendant's counsel that the potential argument identified in the brief is without merit, and we have been unable to find any possible prejudicial error at trial or in the judgment entered.

NO ERROR.

Report per Rule 30(e).

DILLON, Judge.

Judges DIETZ and MURPHY concur.