Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Carolina v. Charliciar Tanniece PRATT
Charliciar Tanniece Pratt (“Defendant”) appeals from an order revoking her probation. We vacate and remand.
I. Background
Defendant pleaded guilty to felony possession of stolen goods and identity theft on 16 September 2020. Defendant was sentenced to 13 to 25 months of imprisonment for identity theft. Defendant was also sentenced to 8 to 19 months of imprisonment for the felony possession of stolen goods. Both sentences were ordered to run concurrently and were suspended for 24 months of supervised probation.
Probation violation reports were filed on 8 March 2022 and 26 April 2022. Warrants for Defendant's arrest were issued on 9 March 2022. Defendant's probation expired on 15 September 2022. The 8 March 2022 and 26 April 2022 violations reports were not heard until a year later and over seven months after the probation had expired on 24 April 2023. The trial court revoked Defendant's probation following a hearing. Defendant appeals.
II. Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction lies in this Court pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 7A-27(b) and 15A-1347 (2023).
III. Issue
Defendant argues the trial court erred in revoking her probation without a finding of good cause pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(f)(3) (2023).
IV. Analysis
The trial court may revoke Defendant's probationary suspended sentence after the probationary period has ended. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344. The probation officer promptly prepared and filed Defendant's probation violation reports prior to the scheduled expiration of Defendant's probation. The trial court also found Defendant had violated a condition of her probation, and she had also absconded supervision. The year's delay, from the filing of the probation violation reports and until hearing were due to delays occasioned in the trial court. The reasons for the year's delay are not addressed in the order.
Defendant argues, and the State concedes, the trial court erred in revoking her probation without making a required finding of good cause pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(f)(1)-(3). The State does not explain this year's delay, but concedes to remand this cause to the trial court for its failure to make a finding of good cause for revoking Defendant's probation after her probationary period expired, as is required by statute. Id.
V. Conclusion
The trial court inexplicably erred in revoking Defendant's probation after the probationary period had ended without making a required finding of good cause pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(f)(3). The order of the trial court is vacated and remanded for prompt hearing on and correction of the error. It is so ordered.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Report per Rule 30(e).
TYSON, Judge.
Judges STROUD and ZACHARY concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. COA23-822
Decided: February 06, 2024
Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)