Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
HENRY JACKSON A/K/A JUNE BUG APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
¶1. In 1993, Henry Jackson was convicted of selling cocaine and sentenced to serve forty years as a nonviolent habitual offender and subsequent drug offender. This Court affirmed his conviction and sentence. Jackson v. State, 662 So. 2d 209 (Miss. Ct. App. 1995).
¶2. In 2022, Jackson filed a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) in the trial court, alleging that the trial court illegally sentenced him as a habitual offender because the State did not prove his actual “served time” on his prior convictions.1 The trial court dismissed the motion because the Mississippi Supreme Court had not granted Jackson permission to file the motion. See Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-7 (Rev. 2020). Jackson appealed, but his appellate brief fails to address the basis of the trial court's order dismissing the case.
¶3. The trial court properly dismissed Jackson's PCR motion for lack of jurisdiction. Section 99-39-7 provides that a PCR motion “shall be filed as an original civil action in the trial court, except in cases in which the petitioner's conviction and sentence have been appealed to the Supreme Court of Mississippi and there affirmed or the appeal dismissed.” Id. (emphasis added). In cases in which a prisoner's conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal, the prisoner must obtain permission from the Mississippi Supreme Court before filing a PCR motion in the trial court. Id. “This procedure is not merely advisory, but jurisdictional.” Dunaway v. State, 111 So. 3d 117, 118 (¶6) (Miss. Ct. App. 2013) (quoting Campbell v. State, 75 So. 3d 1160, 1162 (¶7) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011)). Because Jackson failed to obtain permission from the Supreme Court, the trial court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Id. at 119 (¶8).
¶4. AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. We note in passing that Jackson's claim is without merit. “The requirement that the defendant must have actually served separate terms of one year or more is a requirement of [the violent habitual offender statute] only; the issue is irrelevant under [the nonviolent habitual offender statute].” Berryman v. State, 337 So. 3d 1116, 1135 (¶70) (Miss. Ct. App. 2021), cert. denied, 338 So. 3d 127 (Miss. 2022), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 581 (2023). As noted above, Jackson was sentenced as a nonviolent habitual offender.
WILSON, P.J., FOR THE COURT:
BARNES, C.J., CARLTON, P.J., GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS, McDONALD, LAWRENCE, McCARTY, SMITH AND EMFINGER, JJ., CONCUR.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 2022-CP-00325-COA
Decided: April 18, 2023
Court: Court of Appeals of Mississippi.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)