STATE v. PROPST (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tanner L. PROPST, Appellant.

WD 84236

Decided: March 29, 2022

Before Division Four: Cynthia L. Martin, C.J., Thomas N. Chapman and W. Douglas Thomson, JJ.

Paul Brusati, St. Louis, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Michael Trapasso, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Tanner Propst appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for first-degree assault, first-degree robbery, first-degree burglary, and armed criminal action. In four points on appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt that he was an accomplice to the crimes. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for this decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law