JUVENILE OFFICER v. D.F., Appellant. (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. A.B., Appellant; D.F., Appellant.

WD 83624

Decided: September 29, 2020

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Judge, Presiding, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge, W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent. Tay Ryan Schumaker, Kansas City, MO; Laurie Snell, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

ORDER

A.B. and D.F. appeal the circuit court's judgment terminating their parental rights to D.B. and L.B. In their first three points, A.B. and D.F. contend the circuit court's termination of their parental rights under Sections 211.447.5(2), 211.447.5(3), and 211.447.5(5), RSMo Cum. Supp. 2018, respectively, was unsupported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence. In their fourth point, they contend the court's finding that termination of parental rights was in the best interest of their children was unsupported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law