E.R.G., Respondent, v. STUTEVILLE (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

E.R.G., Respondent, v. Sam J. STUTEVILLE, Appellant.

WD 83517

Decided: September 29, 2020

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, P.J., Lisa White Hardwick and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

Matthew Jones, Maryville, MO, Counsel for Appellant. E.R.G., Maryville, MO, Respondent Acting Pro Se.

ORDER

Sam Stuteville appeals the judgment of full order of protection entered against him by the Nodaway County Circuit Court under the Adult Abuse Act, section 455.010 et seq. He raises two points on appeal contending that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard and that the judgment was not supported by substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reason for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law