DANENBERG JONES v. WALMART INC (2024)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Marissa DANENBERG-JONES, Appellant, v. WALMART, INC., Respondent.

WD 86103

Decided: July 09, 2024

Before Division Three: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Mark Everett Parrish, Brianne Thomas, Joshua Alton Sanders, Erica Collins, Independence, MO, for appellant. Sangeeta Shastry, Taylor Markway, Jennifer Jean Artman, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Marissa Danenberg-Jones appeals from the trial court's entry of judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Walmart, Inc. on Danenberg-Jones's claims for personal injury following an attack in the parking lot of a Walmart store located in Shawnee, Kansas. Danenberg-Jones argues that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of emails between Walmart personnel addressing the addition of security in the parking lot after the attack. Dannenberg-Jones argues that the emails were admissible under an impeachment exception to the rule barring admission of subsequent remedial measures. Alternatively, Danenberg-Jones argues that the emails were not evidence of a subsequent remedial measure and were independently relevant and admissible. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law