HANSEN v. Medica Health Plans, Intervenor–Respondent. (2011)

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Jill E. HANSEN, Respondent/Cross–Appellant, v. DAYTON'S, n/k/a Macy's, Self–Insured, Relator/Cross–Respondent, John G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors, Medica Health Plans, Intervenor–Respondent.

No. A11–0432.

Decided: August 26, 2011

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

Mark J. Freeman, Fitch, Johnson, Larson & Held, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent/cross-appellant. Timothy P. Jung, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relator/cross-respondent. M. Shannon Peterson, McCollum, Crowley, Moschet, Miller & Laak, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for intervenor-respondent.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W .2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson

Associate Justice

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law