Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Arthur BURNHAM v. COMMONWEALTH (No. 1).
The petitioner, Arthur Burnham, appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition for extraordinary relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. We affirm.
In the petition, Burnham primarily seeks relief from a judgment of the Superior Court revoking his probation and imposing a suspended sentence, arguing that the Superior Court's reliance on his mental health issues and treatment in refusing to re-probate him violated the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act.1 The claims he raises are appropriately raised in a direct appeal from the revocation of his probation. See Erickson v. Commonwealth, 462 Mass. 1006, 1007, 966 N.E.2d 795 (2012); Constantine v. Commonwealth, 435 Mass. 1011, 1012, 760 N.E.2d 733 (2002).2 “Our general superintendence power under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is extraordinary and to be exercised sparingly, not as a substitute for the normal appellate process or merely to provide an additional layer of appellate review after the normal process has run its course.” Votta v. Police Dep't of Billerica, 444 Mass. 1001, 1001, 826 N.E.2d 199 (2005).
The single justice did not err or abuse her discretion in denying relief.
Judgment affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. As to the various other allegations of government misconduct in Burnham's brief and other submissions, “[w]e decline to consider matters that were not raised before the single justice, or that are inadequately presented on appeal.” Chawla v. Appeals Court, 482 Mass. 1001, 1003 n.5, 120 N.E.3d 326 (2019), citing Dowd v. Dedham, 440 Mass. 1007, 1007-1008, 795 N.E.2d 572 (2003).
2. To the extent Burnham also challenges the validity of his underlying guilty plea, the appropriate vehicle for that is a motion to withdraw the plea pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 30 (b), as appearing in 435 Mass. 1501 (2001). See Constantine, 435 Mass. at 1012, 760 N.E.2d 733. The Superior Court docket indicates that Burnham filed such a motion, the court denied the motion on March 4, 2020, and Burnham filed a notice of appeal on March 18, 2020.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: SJC-12792
Decided: April 29, 2020
Court: Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)