Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
COMMONWEALTH v. Ervin JOHNSON.
Rescript Opinions.
The defendant, Ervin Johnson, was convicted of murder in the first degree by reason of extreme atrocity or cruelty. See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 429 Mass. 745, 711 N.E.2d 578 (1999). He has filed several postconviction motions in the trial court, most recently, in November 2018, a motion for forensic testing pursuant to G. L. c. 278A. After the motion was denied, Johnson applied to a single justice of this court for leave to appeal from the denial, pursuant to G. L. c. 278, § 33E. The single justice denied the application. Johnson has appealed from the single justice's ruling and the Commonwealth has moved to dismiss the appeal.
Johnson has no right to appeal from the single justice's ruling. “A single justice, acting as a gatekeeper pursuant to G. L. c. 278, § 33E, may allow an appeal to the full court to proceed under that statute if the appeal presents a ‘new and substantial’ question.” Commonwealth v. Anderson, 482 Mass. 1027, 1027, 125 N.E.3d 745 (2019), citing Commonwealth v. Gunter, 459 Mass. 480, 487, 945 N.E.2d 386, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 868, 132 S.Ct. 218, 181 L.Ed.2d 119 (2011). “If the appeal fails on either count, and the single justice denies the application, that decision ‘is final and unreviewable.’ ” Anderson, supra, quoting Commonwealth v. Gunter, 456 Mass. 1017, 1017, 924 N.E.2d 687 (2010). Johnson's attempt to appeal from the single justice's denial of his application must therefore be dismissed.1
Appeal dismissed.
FOOTNOTES
1. To the extent that the defendant suggests, in his opposition to the Commonwealth's motion to dismiss the appeal, that the single justice considered his petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, not, or in addition to, G. L. c. 278, § 33E, we note that although the single justice's initial order denying the petition did refer to G. L. c. 211, § 3, she subsequently issued an amended order referring instead, and correctly, to G. L. c. 278, § 33E.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: SJC-12765
Decided: October 17, 2019
Court: Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)