Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Bodhisattva SKANDHA v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 23.0
Bodhisattva Skandha, an inmate in the custody of the Department of Correction, appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint, which he filed as purported “next friend” of Antonio M. Ferreira, a fellow inmate. Skandha is subject to an order, issued on August 3, 2020, in Skandha vs. Commonwealth, Norfolk Superior Court No. 2082CV00303, requiring prior judicial review of any complaint before acceptance for filing.2 Pursuant to that order, the judge dismissed Skandha's complaint on the ground that Skandha was not authorized “to assert causes of action on behalf of other persons.”
The judge did not abuse his discretion in dismissing the complaint. Because Skandha is not a member of the bar of this Commonwealth, he may not prosecute a legal proceeding on behalf of another person. See LAS Collection Mgmt. v. Pagan, 447 Mass. 847, 849-850 (2006). And although a judge may “appoint a next friend when it appears that an incompetent person is not adequately represented,” Judge Rotenberg Educ. Ctr., Inc. v. Commissioner of the Dep't of Mental Retardation (No. 4), 424 Mass. 476, 479 (1997), there is no indication in the record that Ferreira is incompetent. His affidavit states only that he has difficulty with English and has no understanding of the law. Furthermore, Skandha -- who, as the judge noted, has a history of vexatious litigation -- has failed to establish that he could adequately represent Ferreira's interests.3
Judgment affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
2. Skandha is subject to a similar order in the Superior Court for Suffolk County. See Skandha v. Clerk of the Superior Court for Civ. Business in Suffolk County, 472 Mass. 1017, 1019 (2015).
3. Skandha has already filed several unsuccessful appeals from orders denying next friend status. See Skandha v. Commissioner of Correction, 99 Mass. App. Ct. 1131 (2021) (unpublished); Skandha v. Commonwealth, 98 Mass. App. Ct. 1113 (2020) (unpublished); Skandha v. Middlesex Superior Court, 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1113 (2020) (unpublished).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 20-P-1112
Decided: October 13, 2021
Court: Appeals Court of Massachusetts.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)