Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
F.P. v. C.J.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 23.0
As best can be discerned from the inadequate record in this case, following an ex parte hearing on May 9, 2024, a judge of the District Court issued a temporary G. L. c. 258E harassment prevention order against the defendant, C.J. The order directed the defendant not to contact the plaintiff, F.P., and to stay at least fifty yards from her and her residence. Following a two-party hearing on May 22, 2024, a second judge extended the order until May 21, 2025, and modified the required stay-away distance to fifteen yards. On July 10, 2024, a third judge modified the order by ordering the defendant also to stay at least fifteen yards from the plaintiff's workplace.
The defendant appeals from the order issued following the two-party hearing on May 22, 2024, and the modification order issued on July 10, 2024. No meaningful review in this case is possible because the defendant has not presented this court with an adequate record. Mass. R. A. P. 18 (a), as appearing in 481 Mass. 1637 (2019). See Arch Med. Assocs., Inc. v. Bartlett Health Enters., Inc., 32 Mass. App. Ct. 404, 406 (1992). The defendant contends that she has been “falsely accused of things that never took place,” including “threat[en]ing somebody who I don't know.” She has not, however, provided this court with a copy of the plaintiff's complaint, the plaintiff's motion for modification, or any of the hearing transcripts. “[The] appellant's obligation to include those parts of the trial transcript and copies of motions ‘which are essential for review of the issues raised on appeal ․ is a fundamental and longstanding rule of appellate civil practice’ ” (citation omitted). Cameron v. Carelli, 39 Mass. App. Ct. 81, 84 (1995). “[P]ro se litigants are held to the same standards as practicing members of the bar.” Commonwealth v. Jackson, 419 Mass. 716, 719 (1995). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the harassment prevention orders issued in the District Court.
Orders dated May 22, 2024, and July 10, 2024, affirmed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 24-P-884
Decided: September 23, 2025
Court: Appeals Court of Massachusetts.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)